Friday, 8 February 2013

Reason not to dig 6: Protecting the environment




This post might best be retitled ‘reasons not to plough’. The effect of a gardener’s soil management on the environment is small compared to agriculture. My recent posts about soil have examined how minimum cultivation helps build-up of soil organic matter and in ‘Why Gardeners dig:5’, how in traditional horticulture, nutrient release from the breakdown of organic matter as a result of soil cultivation, is harnessed to benefit plant growth. It is the detrimental consequences of organic matter breakdown that I want to discuss in this post.
 When organic matter degrades it
  • adds carbon dioxide into the atmosphere
  • releases soluble nutrients, in particular nitrogen, which can leach into ground water.
There is also a problem of phosphate pollution when leachate from organic matter left standing on hard surfaces such as tarmac, goes directly into the drains. Soil absorbs phosphate very tightly and normally there is very little leaching from soil. When wind and water erosion physically takes soil into water, then phosphate pollution will happen. It is significant that erosion occurs when soil has been loosened by cultivation. In the UK phosphate pollution of water courses is principally caused by industry and detergents.


Soil organic matter sequesters carbon
The soil in an established pasture might contain in excess of 4% organic matter. More, if you include the bio-mass of living grass. After 25 years ‘under the plough’ this level might be halved. When considered on a worldwide scale, this represents millions of tons of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.
Inevitably when any wild vegetation is brought into cultivation, carbon dioxide will be released. On a global scale the amounts are huge.
Modern farmers can now make their contribution to reducing carbon dioxide release and indeed with enlightened methods, can return carbon to the soil. Although we do not see much movement to ‘no till’ in the UK, on a world scale there are many examples of otherwise vulnerable soils which retain fertility when minimum cultivation methods are used.
Farm field overlooking Yorkshire Wolds. No local fields have been ploughed this year. It has been too wet.
Pollution of water by nitrates and phosphates
These nutrients promote luxuriant growth in aquatic algae and other water plants. When this growth dies it’s decay depletes water of dissolved oxygen, to the detriment of animal life in water courses, lakes and eventually the sea. Not all nitrate leachate entering waterways is from degradation of soil organic matter. Poor fertilizer practices are a significant source of pollution. Organic growers are not absolved of blame - their manures and organic materials also release large amounts of nitrate when they decay. Organic methods, and particularly minimum cultivation, do however tend to minimize this leaching.

Blue lupin as green manure

Agricultural practices that help sequester carbon
The modern farmer can do much to maintain a fertile soil and restore the soil after the detrimental effects of poor past practice.
  • Converting to minimum cultivation methods. Farmers can use shallower soil cultivations. It has been shown that deep cultivation, other than to break up a known cultivation-pan, brings no agronomic benefit, uses far more energy, and greatly increases loss of soil organic matter. 
  • For many crops the use of herbicides ends the need to cultivate for weed control.
  • Farmers can follow one crop immediately with another. Far better than overwintered, ploughed fields leaching nitrate.
  • Use of green manures.
  • It is traditional practice to ‘repair’ damaged agricultural soil by grassing down for a few years. Recent research suggests that inoculating grass seed with mycorrhiza, which add glomalin to the soil, will accelerate this process.
  • Carbon can be directly sequestered in the soil as biochar. I will soon be blogging about the enormous benefits of adding charcoal to the soil!





8 comments:

  1. Since our bad experience with contaminated manure we have steered (sorry no pun intended) clear of it and are trying out green manure now. So far the effects look promising.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Had to think a moment about your excellent pun! I will be blogging about manure soon. Excellent as it is, the weed-seed manure contains is detrimental to my policy of eliminating surface weed seeds from my garden. I also worry about its not infrequent contamination. With minimum cultivation you can have high organic matter without carting it in!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know whether you are aware of our problem if not I hope you'll forgive this link which takes you to a section of my website devoted to the hormone herbicide contamination. At the time I gathered quite a lot of information.

      Delete
    2. I actually read your research at the time! I was such an inexperienced blogger I was rather timid to comment on someone else's blog and also had difficulty in passing the robot tests.
      I am currently pondering how to do the same as you with 'this link'. My son sent me an e-mail that explained how to do it, but have not learnt the trick yet.

      Delete
    3. If you email me - address on my blog - I'll send you the code. I tried to post it but then thought I can't as it will just convert it in the comment!


      Delete
  3. Hello Roger! I only manure every few years but still find I can do a kind of no dig method. I green manure too although this year we used bags of manure from B&Q very expensive but we felt the ground needed it in places and didn't want all the weeds. We use leaf mulch too and generally only dig over a very shallow area and still achieve good results. So I'm a half no- dig if you like!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are doing well Anna. One more push and you will be there!

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...